School of Architecture and Planning





< main

Meeting notes

December 13, 1999

February 7, 2000



Executive summary

Narrative


Workshop / discussions


Wall survey


Newsletters


Conferences


Brownfield exchange
1999 (364Kb)
*



Brownfield exchange
2000 (3690Kb)
*



The rethinking presentation


The rethinking book


Content


Participants


A good regional dialogue


Presentations


Historical perspectives


Precedents


 


* Viewing requires Adobe Acrobat reader plug in. Click here to get it

 

Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Bob Shibley circulated a draft list of "purposes" of the Parks Symposium and asked participants for their comments. Meeting participants thought that the purposes as listed were generally too narrow – there was no indication of community development, of economic development or knowledge-based industries for example. It was also suggested that the word "tourism" as used needed to be broader.

4. Conclusions/ Next Steps

Bill Connor thought that a Symposium would be beneficial for the region. It could be an opportunity to understand global trends and successful initiatives, and would enable Niagara to understand the opportunities at hand. Bill noted that the region is now struggling with slow growth. There is a deep commitment for the bi-national region, and a project like the Symposium can help put a framework around current initiatives and demonstrate our ability to work together. It is important therefore, that we get people to understand what this project is all about.

Edmund Sullivan added that if we can leverage more money, we can make both sides more attractive.

Ed Rutkowski suggested that a time constraint be put on this project. This helps to understand the benefits of the project and the consequences of not working together.

Debbie Whitehouse added that it is important to continue communicating as a group.

In summarizing the discussion, Beth Benson indicated that the group defined a way of "re-thinking" the Niagara region – this includes defining and updating the assets in the region and re-framing them in a new vision that guides investment. Ongoing communication would be key, as well as examining organizational needs.

David Crombie concluded by indicating that an Advisory Group will be assembled for this project, and if anyone wishes to be on this group they should contact Beth Benson or Bob Shibley.

 

Other relevant comments

  • Erie Canal is being given historical designation

  • There is a web-site on Olmsted

  • Visioning could be delayed given the time-line for a decision on the Peace Bridge

  • This project could develop into a Niagara and Region planning institute

(back to the top)

Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

| Projects | Publications | About us | Contact us | Home